Plate Tectonic Sea-Floor "Subduction" Is False
The other 'half' of the Plate Tectonic Theory, sea-floor 'subduction', is just as false as the assumed sea-floor 'spreading'. And truly, if the sea-floor is not 'spreading', then it certainly is not 'subducting' either. These Plate Tectonic assumptions go hand-in-hand. One has to happen so the other can "function" and of course the assumed 'subduction' is only taking place in the mm/year range of 'movement'...
Above: The classic Plate Tectonic 'subduction' diagram indicating how a 'slab' takes a steep dip below another 'slab'. This is Earth science '101' and these simplified diagrams have successfully duped the 'scientific' community as well as most of the public. Duped by the diagram is the way of modern 'science'.
The 'subducting' idea is "explained" as a colder, denser slab of ocean crust is being 'pulled' below a lighter slab. This is allegedly happening in the ocean trenches and island-arc formations. No one in Earth "science" can explain how 'subduction' began, it just did... magically. And remember, this mechanism has only been going on for roughly '200 million' years, because according to 'science' this is the maximum age of the oceanic lithosphere before it is 'pulled' back inside the gut of the Earth shortly after being 'born' at the Mid-Ocean Ridges, or "MOMs" (even the very logistics of the Plate Tectonic theory are banal, yet it is believed by nearly ALL Earth scientists). And don't forget that the continents are allegedly 'billions' of years old due to this on-going mechanical 'movement' of the unfortunate life of the world's ocean crust...
One would think that the 'subduction zones' are parallel to the 'spreading centers' or MOMs, but of course they're not, not even close. While the Atlantic has nearly all the MOMs, and only one tiny 'subduction zone', the Pacific "plate" contains the majority of these 'subduction zones'. Therefore the Pacific is the center for abduction... excuse me, 'subduction'....
Above: The Pacific "plate". Left is the Plate Tectonic cartoon diagram, and right is a view of the Pacific Ocean (one would think that Earth science would have figured out by now that the Earth is indeed round, and sections of the Earth are convex, and NOT "flat" as the word 'plate' alludes). The Pacific does not have any MOMs, but lots of 'subduction zones'. In fact, it is ringed by massive oceanic trenches, or alleged 'subduction zones' (The Pacific is bordered by the Ring of Fire due to all of the volcanism that literally surrounds it). The Pacific Ocean is a huge problem for the PT theory; no MOMs and lots of ocean crust 'abducting' going on. If there are no MOMs, then how can 'subduction' balance off the 'spreading'? Obviously, Earth scientists did no think this one through, yet it is "fact" that the ocean crust is no older than '~200 million' years old while the continents are 'billions' of years old, all due to sea-floor 'spreading' and 'subduction'. It becomes quite clear that the Plate Tectonic theory literally falls apart in the Pacific. And if the Plate Tectonic theory is crumbling to pieces due to inherent problems, then evolution is on shaky ground.
Above: The Peru-Chile trench off the coast of South America. This is an assumed 'subduction zone' where the ocean crust is 'sliding' (instead of 'colliding'...) below the continent thus causing the massive volcanism of the Andes. The Plate Tectonic theory of 'subduction' supposedly provides the water needed to create the magma for volcanism, yet the water is deep within the Earth to begin with as the Bible says. Magma contains dissolved water and water also lowers the melting point of rock. This is why volcanism needs deep subterranean water as H2O is a key ingredient. The very idea that a "slab" of ocean crust is going to 'transport' water deep inside the Earth in order for the volcanism to occur is nothing but preposterous.
Above: A to-scale section through this region. Truly, at this scale the oceanic and terrestrial features are mere 'bumps' on the surface of Earth. One can clearly see that the trench is very wide and not extremely deep in proportion to its width. Now compare this true cross section to the 'subduction' diagram at the beginning of this page. It becomes quite clear that the diagram is simply an oversimplified artistic image of assumed 'subduction', yet according to Earth 'science', this trench is 'providing' all of the needed water/magma for the massive volcanism of this region. What is truly going on in this region (or took place) is massive volcanism period when all of the Fountains of the Great Deep erupted at the onset of the Great Flood. No doubt the trench formation (as well as ALL oceanic trenches) is due to extremely powerful event movement on a unprecedented scale.
Above: This is an 'subduction' anomaly; the intersection of two 'subduction zones' occurring at Kamchatca Peninsula and the Aleutian island chain. If 'subduction' were occurring over milliards of years, then the ocean "slab" would be ripped apart allowing magma to ooze through fissures creating more land (such did occur in the formation of Iceland, another Plate Tectonic anomaly). By simple observation of this area, one can conclude massive disturbance.
Above: Java trench south of Indonesia. This is again an alleged 'subduction zone' but it is quite clear that the Indian Ocean is absent of any MOMs to supply young ocean crust to suck-up... The Plate Tectonic theory truly is all jacked-up, yet it is "fact", the ocean crust is no more than 200 'million' years old while the continents are, ya know, 'billions' of years old... True observation of the ocean topography reveals massive crustal disturbance, or better yet, massive destruction on such a scale that land crashed en-masse during the Great Flood.
Above: Double 'subduction'... Or better yet double trouble for the junk Plate Tectonic theory. The Philippine and Mariana trench (the world's deepest at 6.78 miles, very deep yet still relatively 'shallow' on a global scale). Again, there are no MOM sea-floor 'spreading' centers, but lots of 'subduction'. The bathymetry indicates massive destruction, not mm/yr creeping Plate Tectonic 'movement'. Yes there are faults in these trenches no doubt due to the massive event movement that occurred during the Great Flood. Seismic activity along with volcanism are remnants of the mega destruction of the Noahic Flood.
For kicks, we can “play” around with this so called “subduction” that must occur according to the theory. Let’s consider a section of the Mariana Trench. It is approximately 25 miles wide at its ‘mouth’ and is 6.7 miles deep. So let’s take a 25 mile long section and see just how much oceanic sedimentation buildup will get ‘scraped’ off over time as the slab is ‘pulled’ down into the abyss:
• The volume of this 25mi x 25mi V-shaped section is roughly 2094 cubic miles.
• From our sea-floor "spreading" example which calculated the ‘average’ speed of ‘crust coasting’ after a section leaves MOM, we will use the distance of 12,626 miles.
• Average depth of ocean sedimentation is .4 miles, and of course due to the enormous pressure it will stay ‘glued’ to the basalty crust thus riding along the lengthy journey.
• After 200 million years, 126,260 cubic miles of sediments would have been ‘transported’ into the bin. Thus, after filling Mrs. Mariana once with oceanic debris, we have 124,166 cubic miles of material ‘buildup’ left over.
• If we stacked this material directly over this 25mi x 25mi section, we would end up with an ‘ocean sedimentation’ mega-highrise that is 200 miles tall or 105,600 storeys! Now I will be pre-selling some of the penthouse units, the floor plans are bright and open and the views of the South Pacific will be terrific!
Clearly, after 'millions' of years of alleged 'subducting' going on per the Plate Tectonic theory, there would be a massive pile of sedimentation in ALL ocean trenches, yet they are void of such material. The reason they are void of massive sedimentation piles, is because sea-floor 'subduction' is false.
Truly, I can go on and on demonstrating how the Plate Tectonic theory is nothing but assumed junk science. The sea floor is not 'spreading', nor is the sea-floor 'subducting'. Earth 'science' has abused the bunk Plate Tectonic theory to "prove" an old Earth with the whimsical idea of Continental Drift, but their claims are indeed false. True observation of the oceanic topography reveals massive crustal destruction. This destruction took place during the Great Flood of Noah when all of the Fountains of the Great Deep burst open. What followed was mega-destruction of the Earth and all living creatures who had the "breath of life" perished. What we observe today is a rocky mess on the surface of the Earth's including the ocean basins. The Pacific Ocean is a mega land-crash as there are an estimated 50,000 volcanic edifices in the Pacific alone. These volcanic remnants truly represent land wrecks caused by the Great Flood.
The Bible is indeed accurate in regards to Earth's history. 'Science' has come up with the false Plate Tectonic theory in order to cover up the truth of a destroyed Earth with a 'creeping' mm/yr "movement" of far-fetched sea-floor 'spreading' and 'subducting' ideas along with geological formations being due to absurd 'plate crashes'. According to mainstream 'science', everything on the crust of the Earth is a result of an irrational Plate Tectonic bash... The evolutionary continental and ocean crust demolition derby is over as the evolutionary ship of delusion is sinking. These alleged "plate" crash scenarios only exist in the imaginations of 'science', while true observation of these massive oceanic trenches is a clear testament to the total destruction of the Earth during the Great Flood.